I had decided that my life would not be complete without a hand carved German Cuckoo Clock so here we are. The basic design of the Cuckoo Clock stretches back to before 1800. The count of the weights hanging from the clock indicate the number of features that a clock has: 2 weights one to drive the clock and the other to drive the cuckoo. 3 weights add a music box to the mix.
The fact that the clock is entirely weight driven makes it rather easy to figure out how much energy is used up driving the clock. This posed a question that I wanted an answer to:
For how long would a standard Snickers bar power the 2 weight Cuckoo Clock that I have ?
Let's get a rough answer !
From measurement the clock weights move about 19 inches over 2 days.
This means that over two days gravity is 'calling back' the work that was done to lift the weights 19 inches.
The 'standard' value for gravity at the surface of the earth at 45 degrees latitude is 9.80665 meters/second-squared.
Because the earth is spinning the effect of gravity is less at the equator than it is at the poles because of the centrifugal effect wanting to 'throw' the object off the surface thus it matters greatly where on earth the measurement is taken. 45 degrees latitude is close enough so we'll use that.
The weight (mass) of the 2 weights totals 3 kilograms
So the amount of energy in Newton-Meters that it takes to run the clock for a day is:
From the information on the wrapper, a 2 oz Snickers bar contains 273 nutrition calories (a nutrition calorie is about 1000 energy calories)
Of course the human body cannot turn all of the candy bars energy into muscle power, but estimates put the conversion efficiency at between 20-25%. We'll take the low end and assume that 20% of the Snickers bar gets turned into the muscle power used to lift the clocks driving weights.
So the energy required per day in nutrition-calories is:
I went to a Post Office to buy some stamps the other day and was soundly disappointed with what came out of the machine
This has got to be the *worst* looking USPS issued stamp that I've ever seen. Despite it's message, there is nothing worth celebrating here, not for an instant and *certainly* not FOREVER !
Contrast the workmanship and care that used to go into US Postal Service stamps printed from engraved plates:
Look up close and marvel at the beautiful detail:
I for one certainly can't fault the new stamp for being cost efficient: stamps printed on location on demand. With all of the financial trouble that the USPS is in it would be irresponsible now to spend what it takes to produce stamps the old fashioned way.
Near the Post Office where the stamps came from, at Market and Powell is a sidewalk repair eyesore. Where there used to be a hand laid brick sidewalk, the repair job consisted of concrete surfaced to resemble brick.
This eyesore might have been palatable if the concrete could have at least been painted to resemble masonry.
With tight budgets the organizations producing these visual disappointments really have no choice but to do a functional job for the lowest price possible. I think Ronald Reagan referred to this as 'getting the government off our backs'.
Such as it is, aesthetic costs money and right now we can't afford it.
So in my previous post I showed a motorcycle advertisement that I'd happened upon in which a Ballerina was used to suggest how maneuverable (and graceful) the advertised motorcycle was.
Now here I've stumbled upon an audition invitation from the Paul Taylor Dance Company in which they've decided to use a motorcycle to suggest speed and excitement (the kind of excitement that you'll have if you are accepted into that Company I presume).
It's nicely full-circle now Dancer to sell the Bike and Bike to sell the Dance Company.
This really would have been unthinkable say, 50 years ago...
When Hunter Thompson (I believe) observed that at that time (in the '60s) Harley-Davidson basically had only 2 identifiable groups of people buying their bikes: the Police and the Outlaw Gangs